First ever session with a personal trainer this morning. Enjoyed it. I will be healthier next year.

Your taste is what makes you interesting. Not the things everyone else likes too. Not the consensus opinion. Not whatever TikTok has decided you should see today. The messy, personal, sometimes inexplicable preferences that develop when you actually have to seek things out rather than having them delivered to you. That's taste, and it's worth protecting.

Yes. This.

Lately I’ve been finding myself wondering why I stopped buying vinyl when I went to university and wishing I hadn’t stopped. The hours spent on a Saturday in record shops in Nottingham picking up records, giving them a listen, and then deciding if it was worth my hard earned cash. It was time well spent. I had a curated record collection. Now I have an Apple Music account with a library over flowing with music I’ve saved over the last 2 decades. I’ve no idea what’s in there and most of it hasn’t been listened to in years. I rely on the suggestions to find new stuff. Is there a wonder I sometimes open the app and have no clue what to listen to?

When people ask me what I’m listening to these days I have boring answers, or no answer at all. 20 years ago I had a list of interesting records I’d discovered, white label remixes, EP’s by some random artist that I’ve never come across since but which were a real joy to listen to.

When I think about how the money I spent then compares to the money I’ve spent on music in the last 15 years, there’s a stark contrast. I have something to show for the time and energy in those record shops (all be it in my parents garage), but I have nothing for the money spent on streaming services since. One has tangible results with a defined taste, the other has disappeared in to the ether and I can’t remember the amazing EP I found 10 years ago because it’s too hard to find.

Technology has made music easier to listen to, but it’s also made it less valuable. The type of music I listen to now has broadened and my taste has become less tangible as a result. That’s kind of sad.

The Case Against Customer Reviews

Niq touches on a subject I’ve been thinking about over the last few days, online reviews. His focus is on the fake ones that people write in return for a discount, reviews that don’t offer a true reflection of the work/service/product received. Quite rightly, he points out that:

Online ratings are built upon trust. Of course, every person has their own rating system, but still, if anything on the internet has a rating close to 5 stars, you can usually expect it to be a genuinely positive experience.

Fake online ratings, however, destroy this system of trust. Dear people of the internet: Don’t take the bait out of personal greed to get a lousy 10% discount when you have to sell your soul in exchange.

Whilst I agree with this, I am starting to land in a different place. The general population should not be allowed to post reviews. It’s a little extreme perhaps, but bear with me.

I think reviews should be entirely objective and there should be no space for a disgruntled customer to post a quick, one-line, one-star review on Google. It benefits no one other than to placate a temporary feeling by the poster. It is an ineffective byproduct of our society which places strong emphasis on instant gratification before moving on to the next thing. It encourages a world lacking in forgiveness and compassion.

Before the internet, we turned to experts to understand what was good or bad about something we are less informed of. The world of food has the Michelin guide, hotels have AA ratings, businesses relied on good service, but now a Google rating of 4.5 or above is a marketing gimmick.

One of my favourite local cafes consistently serves top-quality coffee from friendly and knowledgeable baristas. Its Google rating just dropped to 4.4 because of one disgruntled customer posting a 2-star review that by all accounts is inaccurate. It certainly does not reflect my experience or the experience of the many regulars I see in there every morning. If it did, they wouldn’t keep coming back.

The question ultimately, is: why do we give people the power to post a negative review (or positive) when they could be having a bad day and one thing out of character happens in a cafe that tips them over the edge?

I would much rather pay attention to an objective review of a place written by someone who knows their stuff and who likely has visited multiple times before forming their opinion.

I absolutely love this two-part desk setup.

Instead of having a single, tech only desk, I now use one large desk that is split into two parts: a digital side and an analog side.

My desk used to be my dining table, but when Covid hit I quickly realised the small occasional desk I used wasn’t big enough for me. I gave that desk to my Mum and set up camp on my dining table. Over time it’s become my place of work for 90% of my job, the other 10% is begrudgingly spent in the office. It’s dominated by my Samsung display (I would love a Studio Display) but if I have time in amongst the calls today I might try to rejig and create more space for my analogue tools. Some kind of split like this might work, rather than having my offline items mixed around all the tech.

I proved a very well known hypothesis in UX/UI design this morning. Users don’t read. I also proved that primary buttons need to be very carefully chosen, especially when they don’t do what the user thinks they will do. On a somewhat related note, Bitbucket’s commenting system is very poorly designed.

They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them.

From For the Fallen By Laurence Binyon

Claude, meet Obsidian

After finishing work for the day I spent a little time futzing around setting up an MCP server with my Obsidian vault and it seems like a fascinating way to interact with the notes I have in there.

The initial setup wasn’t as smooth sailing as it should’ve been. The MCP server plugin requires installing another plugin which creates a secure Local REST API for your vault, try as I might, I couldn’t get it to enable. Of course this meant I needed to get it working more than ever! Turning off all the community plugins and turning the REST API one on first got things working and when I enabled the rest of the plugins again it continued to work.

As a test I asked Claude if it could see my Obsidian notes and it came back with a summary of my vault. Huzzah!

The next step was to ask it to find a recipe note, take the ingredients from it, and then make a groceries project with the ingredients as tasks in Things. It worked and was a much smoother process than finding the recipe in Mela and adding the ingredients to Reminders.

What I like about this is that it all happens locally and none of the conversations are used to train Claude’s models. This kind of connection between local apps is the first time I’ve felt like these AI tools could become useful for me.

Matthew Smith is sharing the photos he took on his recent trip to Japan and there are some lovely shots that capture both the people and the place. Well worth a scroll if you’ve any interest in Japan and it’s culture.